| City of Redmond Fish and Fish Habitat Distribution Study |
| Island County Creek Restoration Planning |
| King County Water Type Survey |
| Vashon Island Water Type Survey |
| Port Ludlow Water Type Survey |
Cherry Valley Floodplain Restoration and Protection Project
by Jamie Glasgow
The Snoqualmie River in King County Washington is listed on the 303(d)-water
quality impaired list for exceeding temperature, total suspended sediments, and
fecal coliform standards. The majority of these impacts associated with Cherry
Creek, a tributary to the main stem Snoqualmie located just north of Duvall,
derive from agricultural land use practices. The lower reaches of the Creek,
including a ditched tributary network, are located within the Washing
ton
Department of Fish and Wildlife Cherry Valley Wildlife Unit (the Unit). Within
the Unit, grazing by cattle is the method of choice to control reed canary
grass, an invasive noxious weed. However, uncontrolled animal access to flood
plain tributaries and mainstem Cherry Creek would have adverse impacts on fish,
fish habitat and water quality through bank erosion, sediment input, fecal
coliform input and degeneration of riparian shade producing vegetation.
Ditched tributaries within the Unit are known to provide low gradient rearing
habitat for coho salmon, cutthroat trout, and other native fishes, but few data
are available to document summer low flow water quality parameters that may
preclude fish use or in fact contribute to fish mortality. The off-channel
habitat types protected and enhanced by this project have been identified as
limited in quantity and quality within the Snohomish basin by the WRIA 07 ESA
Technical Committee.
In 1999, Washington Trout received funding from the King County Department of
Natural Resources Water Works grant program to implement the Cherry Valley
Monitoring and Fencing Project. The project has complemented previously
completed Washington Trout riparian restoration work in the Cherry Creek drainage
to protect
water
quality and fish habitat in the Unit. The project will improve water quality
and fish habitat, benefit other wildlife species, and enhance human
recreational and agricultural use on the Unit. It will also provide data of
relevance to recent King County Best Management Practices for ditch maintenance
and will allow evaluation of the effects of current King County Livestock
Ordinances, which permit cattle to graze as close as 25 feet to a stream.
Volunteers Jeff Martin and Bosco
assist with the revegatation of Cherry Creek.
The project was comprised of three components. First, baseline biological and water quality data were collected in the Cherry Creek tributaries within the Unit. In cooperation with the Tulalip Tribes, water temperature, dissolved oxygen, and fecal coliform counts were collected from twelve points in the lower Cherry valley. Several biological samples were also taken to determine fish and amphibian species presence and relative abundance. The results of the fish species composition and relative abundance work further underscore the necessity to remove or repair the pumphouse/floodgate located at the confluence of Lateral A and Cherry Creek.
Aquatic species relative abundance in the Cherry Valley Wildlife Unit, samples summed.

Second, two cattle pastures, each approximately 300 acres, were created with
12,000 feet of fence line. The two fenced pastures, occupied by 90 head of
cattle, will reduce unit maintenance costs by minimizing the need to mow the
fields. Because the fence lines for the pastures are at the required distance
of 25 feet from the tributaries, the two pastures also give Washington Trout
the opportunity to evaluate King County Best Management Practices for
agricultural production districts.
Third, 2745 trees were planted in 15 experimental plots within the riparian
areas of the Cherry Creek tributaries within the Unit. Fifteen identical
28-foot by 75-foot experimental plots, each abutting a tributary, were each
planted wit
h a
total of 2745 trees. One of five different treatments was randomly assigned to
each of the fifteen plots, providing three replicates of each treatment.
Treatments included different site preparations, the use of different sizes of
trees, the use of different rodent guards, and the use of plastic sheeting or
cardboard sheet mulching to control the growth of reed canary grass around the
newly planted trees
In
addition to providing shade and allochthonous inputs to the tributaries, the
plantings will help shade out the invasive noxious weed reed canary grass that
has infested the floodplain. Also, the experimental nature of the planting has
allowed and will continue to allow Washington Trout to evaluate five different
treatments for planting in reed canary grass.
Preliminary results from the vegetation monitoring show minor losses, mostly
due to natural causes, likely transplant trauma. As of August 2000, only 3% of
the planted trees and whips had died. This number is surprisingly low,
considering the presence of a well-established beaver population in the Cherry
Valley floodplain. The sites will be revisited in 2001 to evaluate the success
of the five different rodent guard and plot preparation treatments.
Fish, vegetation, and water quality data collected at Cherry Valley in the
coming years will allow us to assess the success of the fencing and
revegetation project, as well as assess the effectiveness of the King County
Best Management Practices for Agricultural Production Districts.